Mark DeBofsky, founding attorney of DeBofsky Law, was recently featured in a Law360 article titled 3 Attorney Takeaways On What’s Ahead As ERISA Turns 50. As ERISA (Employee Retirement Income Security Act) marks its 50th anniversary, Mark shared his insights on how courts are currently processing ERISA health and welfare benefit claims.

In the article, Mark addresses a critical issue regarding how administrative law standards are applied to insurance disputes under ERISA.  He explains, “Courts have been treating these claims like administrative law cases. Except in states where discretionary clauses are banned, courts defer to the decisions made by insurance companies if policies give them interpretive authority.”

Mark emphasizes that this approach is flawed, noting, “Courts have forgotten that insurance companies are not the same as federal administrative law judges.” His commentary highlights growing concerns about how ERISA claims are mishandled under this framework, stressing the need to reassess the standards applied in such cases.

Mark’s contribution highlights DeBofsky Law’s ongoing commitment to advocating for the fair treatment of claimants and pushing for necessary reforms in ERISA litigation.

Read the full Law360 article here.

Related Articles

How to Request Your ERISA Plan Documents: A Step-by-Step Guide

How to Request Your ERISA Plan Documents: A Step-by-Step Guide

The Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) was established in 1974 to protect employees’ rights to their benefits and provide transparency regarding their employee benefit plans. One of the key rights under ERISA is access to plan documents that outline the rules, benefits, and administration of your employer-sponsored retirement or health plan. […]

Texas Judges Ignored ERISA’s Core To Stall Fiduciary Rule

Texas Judges Ignored ERISA’s Core To Stall Fiduciary Rule

A New York Times article in May reported that in this year’s annual letter to investors, BlackRock Inc. Chair and CEO Larry Fink wrote that “the United States was facing a retirement crisis due in no small part to self-directed retirement financing.”[1] The New York Times article pointed to the shift from defined benefit to defined contribution retirement plans; i.e., 401(k) plans. […]