A common reason given for denials of health insurance coverage is a “lack of medical necessity.”  When an insurance company denies a claim on that basis, that means the insurer disagrees with the patient’s doctor and is substituting its own judgment in order to deny treatment the doctor deemed necessary for the patient’s well-being.  Medical necessity denials are especially prevalent in claims involving mental health disability, such as situations where sub-acute residential treatment is recommended to treat a variety of conditions such as substance use disorders, eating disorders, and adolescent behavioral disorders.  However, medical necessity denials occur with respect to all aspects of medical treatment.

Medical Necessity Letters Are Applicable to All Medical Claims

The way a patient can counter a denial based on a medical necessity determination is with a letter of medical necessity from the treating doctor explaining the treatment rationale and why other potential treatments are deemed less efficacious.  I recently collaborated with three other authors – Joseph Feldman, Eric Pleikun, M.D., and Cheryl Potts – to draft an article on letters of medical necessity which was published in the July 2021 issue of the Journal of Psychiatric Practice.  The article explains letters of medical necessity – their purpose and what needs to be included in such a letter, and includes a helpful guide to both patients and practitioners on how to draft a convincing letter of medical necessity.

Although the article is focused on psychiatric claims, the discussion in the journal article is applicable to all medical claims and offers guidance on how to counter an insurance company’s claim that a test, treatment, medication, or other healthcare-related service lacks medical necessity.

A copy of the full article published in the Journal of Psychiatric Practice may be found here.

Related Articles

The Importance of Judicial Standards of Review in ERISA Litigation

The Importance of Judicial Standards of Review in ERISA Litigation

Congress enacted the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) law to protect . . . participants in employee benefit plans and their beneficiaries, by requiring the disclosure and reporting to participants and beneficiaries of financial and other information with respect thereto, by establishing standards of conduct, responsibility, and obligation for fiduciaries of employee benefit plans, and by providing for appropriate remedies, sanctions, and ready access to the Federal Courts. […]

ERISA-Governed vs. Non-ERISA Group Benefits: Key Differences and Why They Matter

ERISA-Governed vs. Non-ERISA Group Benefits: Key Differences and Why They Matter

The Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) affects millions of Americans with employer-sponsored benefits, but most don’t know until a claim is denied. ERISA is an acronym for the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, a law passed by Congress in 1974. The primary intent behind ERISA was to protect employees’ retirement benefits. [..]

ERISA Venue Provisions: Where Can You File Your Benefits Lawsuit?

ERISA Venue Provisions: Where Can You File Your Benefits Lawsuit?

The Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) governs private sector employee benefits plans, including retirement, disability, and health plans. One of the key aspects of ERISA litigation is the question of venue — where participants or beneficiaries file their lawsuits when they believe their plan rights are violated. […]